UPDATED: Assassinating Biden: Will the Deep State Do It?

A killing of a king is unfolding before our eyes.

Updated July 23rd, 2024: More information has been revealed that suggest Biden might have had a medical emergency and is dying or already dead. You can read about that here: MEDIA BLACKOUT: "Biden was dying or possibly dead already," Rumored by Las Vegas Police, Confirmed by the Dossier.

Trump rightfully believes the media will attempt to turn Biden into a hero, so Trump can talk about his failures without seeming like a bad guy, which is no doubt the deep state’s intention.

Updated July 22nd, 2024: Nearly two weeks ago, I wrote this article as an interesting take on an theory I admittedly didn’t think was all that plausible. Now there’s good reason to believe the deep state is in fact carrying out the very covert assassination that I explored in this article. I have added an updated set of arguments in the article JUST AS PREDICTED: Joe Biden Might Be Dead Soon, According to Brother Frank Biden, which I released on July 21st, 2024. This was hours after Frank Biden told media that he believes his brother Joe Biden might be gravely ill. Today, I released another update, with even more things that indicate the real Biden might no longer be with us in the article More Rumors Biden is Dead: Biden's Fake Kamala Harris Campaign Call, Van Jones Allusion. I will post more updates to this article and my Substack in general, as this story evolves.

Is the deep state about to do away with Joe Biden in a dramatic event to galvanize the anti-Trump movement? While this is arguably unlikely, there’s plausible reason to think there is a “killing of a king” operation unfolding. In this article, we’ll carefully examine the arguments for and against this theory, review narrative warfare, identity politics, and how the globalists maintain their power through the identity cults of modernity.

Would the same criminal deep state that helped steal the 2020 election, fosters human and drug trafficking, and is presently looting the US Treasury through the Ukraine war try to kill or otherwise get rid of Biden to maintain their power? These are arguably the same people who helped orchestrate the COVID pandemic, covered up the John F. Kennedy assassination, and have already committed elder abuse against the aging Joe Biden.

Origin of the Assassinate Biden Theory

After watching the post-debate coverage and researching the rules for getting rid of candidate-Biden, it occurred to me that the deep state might not have many moves left. They seem to be positioning for Biden’s removal; I think that's clear, but would they go as far as to kill a sitting president?

There are benefits I’ll list out later for why using the 25th Amendment isn’t as powerful as a more dramatic solution. This more dramatic solution would help create unity, drum up support, and help declaw Trump and the massive movement he represents to replace Joe Biden, and by extension, the globalist agenda Biden embodies.

As detailed in Biden Replacement Process: The Rules, Timeline, Contenders, and Polls | ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW, the DNC, donors, and Democrats in general can’t just remove Biden via majority vote. As a matter of fact, there is no rule to remove a candidate once they’ve been chosen. The only option they have is for Biden to step down. However, Biden has refused to step down, saying he has no intentions of doing so. Half the party is split between the shallow and obligatory support of Biden and the growing group of Democrats calling for his replacement.

After the disastrous debate between Trump and Biden, when in the post-debate aftermath the calls for Biden’s replacement rang out like a siren song into the political landscape, I began to consider the deep state’s options. What could they do to rid themselves of Biden and regain some political clout?

Clearly, no one who says they support Biden after the debate is genuine, or they're suffering from their own cognitive decline. This implies the emergence of a plot, perhaps an attempt to replace Biden with something more dramatic and powerful.

For years, the intelligence agency that supports mainstream media has worked overtime and expended every ounce of clout they have with the general public to push the lie that Biden is intelligent, capable, experienced, and presidential. However, following the debate, the narrative has abruptly shifted. Biden is now a danger to democracy, as Joe Scarborough, one of his most staunch supporters, put it, not even 24 hours later.

The following post-debate mainstream media coverage summarizes the stark transition.

Source

Source

Source

The Killing of the King: Negative Campaigning to Erode Candidate Allegences

How do you get all the layers of your compartmentalized control system to go along with a move to replace a sitting president, especially at this late stage of the campaign? Since these rank-and-file members, from low-income Democrats to mega-donors, don’t know all the plans and agendas of the deep state, you need a powerful yet coherent narrative that can galvanize the whole layer cake. As I will argue in this article, I believe the deep state has been planning and is currently executing their plot to kill the king.

In a cult-like civilization where blind belief, dogma, and groupthink are the norm, a sitting ruler, the king, must be “killed” in order for the herd to accept their new ruler. This is because the more dogmatic and uncritical the thinking of the population, the more dependent they are on official, carefully manufactured narratives to sway their opinions, as we'll explore later.

In modern politics, no matter how good an incumbent is, the party they belong to often exaggerates their shortcomings, failures on key issues, and other flaws to get the once-loyal people to decouple. This was especially true in a primary between party candidates running for the same government office.

Here are three examples.

1. 2008 Democratic Primary: During the 2008 Democratic primary, both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama engaged in negative campaigning against each other. One notable example was an ad released by the Clinton campaign that questioned Obama's preparedness to handle a national security crisis, which was criticized for being misleading and fear-mongering.

2. 2016 Republican Primary: During the 2016 Republican primary, Donald Trump and Ted Cruz engaged in a heated and often personal negative campaign against each other. One notable example was an ad released by the Cruz campaign that featured a picture of Trump's wife, Melania, in a revealing outfit, which was criticized for being tasteless and hypocritical.

3. 2020 Democratic Primary: During the 2020 Democratic primary, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren engaged in a negative campaign against each other over their respective healthcare plans. One notable example was an ad released by the Warren campaign that accused Sanders of being unrealistic and not being able to pay for his healthcare plan, which was criticized for being misleading and overly negative.

The goal is to make the opponent seem like the enemy, and the candidate who uses the negative campaign strategy appears to be the one offering the solution—themselves. This methodology is based on another well-established and heavily used aspect of narrative seeding: the antagonistic-protagonist dynamic.

By strategically placing elements within a story to shape the audience's perception or emotions, narrative seeding transforms the political campaign into a drama that portrays the candidates as characters. Heightened emotions lead to an investment in the narrative and its characters. The goal is to win over the audience (the electorate) by making them see one candidate as the hero and the other as the villain.

Both Trump and the globalists use these methods. And as I said, these things are critical for success when a civilization has devolved into competing camps of mostly unthinking people. Ideally, a population is educated properly through their healthy truth-centric culture, and these types of tactics aren't needed to ensure civilization isn't hijacked by a parasitic elite, as it most certainly has been for some time.

As a sidebar, the fact that these methods are being used by Trump and the Patriots is itself a point of confusion for some who believe their use at all proves that Trump is a bad actor.

It's like sowing seeds that grow into specific ideas or sentiments. When it comes to the protagonist-antagonist dynamic, these characters play pivotal roles in shaping public opinion:

Protagonist

• The protagonist is the story's central character, often portrayed as the hero or main figure.

• Their journey, struggles, and growth captivate readers or viewers, which is why many campaign ads have a good guy, bad guy theme.

• Protagonists contribute to character development by showcasing resilience, virtues, and flaws.

  • Trump is one of the most resilient people, unable to be affected by the fake news media and the lawfare thrown against him.

  • He is virtuous, speaking out against the horrors of globalism while he promises hope through his America First agenda.

  • And he has his flaws, like eating McDonalds, getting off topic at the podium, and calling people names as a brash yet honorable man.

• Their actions and decisions drive the plot forward, creating tension and engagement.

Antagonist

• The antagonist opposes the protagonist, representing conflict and challenge.

  • Trump characterizes Biden as the “worst president in history.”

• They can be a villain with malevolent intent or a more complex character with varied motivations.

• Antagonists contribute to plot dynamics by creating obstacles, raising stakes, and forcing the protagonist to evolve.

  • Biden, by “defeating Trump” in 2020, created obstacles, raised the stakes, and provided Trump with a narrative arc, despite the fact that Trump arguably hasn’t changed all that much.

• Exploring the villain's perspective adds depth and nuance to the narrative.

  • Trump highlights Biden’s viewpoint and ambitions to add depth and further compel investment in the cause he represents.

Impact on Public Opinion

• The interplay between protagonist and antagonist influences how audiences perceive the unfolding story. Hence, the narrative of both Biden and Trump is different with each of them being portrayed differently in their respective political rhetoric.

• Public sentiment shifts based on which character gains sympathy or support using the respective narratives.

• The battle of wits and political jousting between them keeps the population engaged and invested, hopefully drawing in voters who normally tune out.

In terms of Biden, the sitting King, the story the deep state needs to craft has to be compelling, captivating, and engaging. The audience, their supporters, have to believe in the causes represented by the candidate, and most importantly, believe the candidate can actually beat their opponent. Biden is clearly not that person, as the debate proved to the world. A replacement is needed one who can rally support and who can capture the disillusioned population Biden has left in the lurch.

Do I believe the deep state will do away with Joe Biden?

To be clear, I’m not putting all my chips on this theory. I’m simply exploring the idea because I think it’s plausible, which I’ll take the time to demonstrate in this article. However, just because a theory is plausible doesn’t mean it’s likely. That said, I think it’s beneficial to explore ideas in general, for which the ways the deep state manipulates the people through narrative are a good thing to understand and develop an immunity against.

The Democrats, by their own admission, are in a desperate panic to remove Biden. Trump and his supporters, including myself, believe that maintaining Biden's position will enable us to achieve our desired outcome—another Trump administration in 2025.

In case any three-letter agencies want to interpret this article as a pretext to argue that I'm in favor of Joe Bide's assassination, I refute such claims unequivocally now. I am in no way advocating for, promoting, or endorsing any plot to assassinate Joe Biden. I am fundamentally against the use of bad faith, coercion, violence, or murder in any capacity, as a Christian and a man who believes in the true rule of law. I have not used such techniques against the many people who have wronged me in life. And I will not advocate for such a position with Biden, or anyone, for that matter. On the contrary, I actually pray for God’s light and wisdom to pour into the hearts and minds of all those confused by evil, spiritual cowardice, or malevolent aims.

Plausibility Assessment

While there are some benefits the deep state can accrue from a dramatic method of doing away with Biden, there are some significant risks that, in my mind, make it unlikely they will choose this option. If they were going to do this, it’s likely they'd do a covert assassination, for reasons I will explain later.

Let’s assess whether or not this theory is plausible, meaning there’s a chance it could happen. The term "probable" refers to something that is both possible and likely to occur.

For instance, it’s plausible that I might win the lottery if I purchase a ticket, but it’s not probable.

Objectives and Types of Assassinations

Despite the fact I’m not all in on this theory, assassinating a political figure is not only likely; it might be par for the course for the deep state.

• Overt assassination involves murder, where it’s obvious the target was killed intentionally, often with the perp taking credit and citing a political ideology as part of the motive.

  • The goal is to scare enemies, change the political landscape in some way, or otherwise have an effect on the world, citizens, and other actors on the political battlefield.

  • Examples of overt assassinations include those of Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy, in which the suspected assassins confessed, citing a political issue as their motivation. Both events shaped history, which is why it’s appealing when a faction is desperate to maintain their ground.

• Covert assassination entails murder, disguised to appear as an accident or a result of natural causes. Examples of covert assassination methods include poison, induced cancer, bioweapons of some sort, or a car accident or plane crash.

  • Examples of covert assassination include Yassar Arafat, who apparently had high levels of polonium-210 and lead-210 in his system, and more recently, Alexei Navalny, who died suddenly after his wife brought snacks to him in prison.

• Reputational assassination destroys the target’s reputation while leaving the target alive. The assassination degrades the target's status within the general population. Reputation assassins often use blackmail-style information as their preferred weapon, revealing true and damaging information that undermines the target's credibility, social connections, and ability to pursue their goals or agenda, thereby depriving them of the necessary social standing. However, they don't always use true information to destroy a person's reputation.

  • An example of reputation assassination is Donald J. Trump, who has had dozens of fake news stories made up in an effort to paint him as a racist (Charlottesville), a power-hungry tyrant (J6), or a womanizer (E. Jean Carrol, Access Hollywood Tapes, and Storm Daniels).

• Combination assassinations involve both murdering the target and destroying their reputation. Given that the objective of assassination, generally, is to have an effect on the world that benefits the assassin or the group that orders the assassination, a combination of both is likely desirable.

The mainstream perspective identifies the following reasons or motives for assassination:

• Political Purposes: Some assassinations aim to take control, ignite a revolution, highlight a cause, exact retribution, or weaken a regime or its opponents.

• Personal Grief or Desire for Attention: Personal grievances or a desire to be the center of attention may motivate some assassins.

• Ideological Beliefs: The commitment to certain ideologies, such as Marxism or communism, motivates some assassins.

• Desire for Societal Change: Some assassins may wish to effect changes in society's structure.

• Psychological Factors: Complex psychological factors may drive assassins in some cases. Some assassins may feel suicidal and believe they have nothing to lose.

Each of these acknowledged reasons is valid in its own right, but they fail to account for the intelligence agencies and the deep state they work for.

The fact is the powers that be orchestrate assassinations for societal control agendas. While I do think organic assassinations have likely happened in the past, I contend that the vast majority of assassinations, especially over the past few hundred years, are likely fueled, fostered, and conceived by the deep state.

Narrative Warfare, the Ultimate Control Device

This article would be book-length if it fully explored the significance of narrative control as a tool of the deep state.

Narrative warfare, as we might refer to it, is one of the oldest, most effective, and nearly imperceptible forms of coercive influence. It’s also the most widely used.

As was discussed in the The Matrix Film and Dark and Light Occultism section of the Trump Knows article, human beings engage with reality through symbolic tapestries due to the fact that reality, in its entirety, is far too rich in information to comprehend all at once. This means that, for all intents and purposes, we engage with our narratives about reality instead of reality itself.

• First, our senses receive data based on their information-capturing potential, which is already low compared to the amount of information in reality. Our attentional focus and the degree of distraction we experience in the present moment further diminish what we perceive.

• Second, innate biases and the brain's natural hardware, which prioritizes one thing over another, further filter this raw data.

• Third, what we believe or want to believe filters or enhances our conscious interaction with our thoughts, instincts, and insights that arise based on what we receive through the senses.

• Fourth, our metacognitive inner experience is heavily influenced by the social memories, impressions, and images of others. A lifetime's worth of social interactions, both with individuals and groups as a whole, whether small or global in scope, almost entirely color our thoughts, attitudes, interests, and beliefs.

According to the American sociologist Charles Horton Cooley, our experiences with others and our culture greatly influence our self-perception and, through this, our perception of reality. Cooley termed this the Looking Glass Self. Knowing this, the intelligence agencies use effective and powerful forms of narrative warfare to augment our perceptions of reality. They can influence our thoughts, opinions, and, as a result, our behavior. Edward Bernays, the man most known for pioneering the manipulation of public opinion via mass media, arguably developed propaganda for this reason.

When it comes to assassinations, the intelligence agencies are primarily responsible for upholding the intricate web of cultural beliefs and values that shape and uphold the current state of affairs, while also molding and shaping the world through the targets of this narrative warfare: humanity itself. Assassinations are just one of the many assets used by these reality crafters to maintain these powerful narratives and ensure their carefully laid plans come to fruition. This is accomplished via all forms of media, including books, news papers, magazines, radio, TV, and, more recently, video games and the internet.

Here is an excerpt from a speech by David Rockefeller, which confirms the importance of narrative warfare and the media partners required to maintain narratives.

Source

Intelligence Agency Tools for Covert Assassinations

There’s ample evidence to confirm at least two politically motivated intelligence agency-backed assassinations that have taken place somewhat recently in history. Declassified documents and CIA operatives have come forward, confirming that intelligence agencies engage in intentional murder (assassination) as a standard practice. The intelligence agencies often select targets with political motivations, either to protect or advance political agendas for the government or its secret benefactors, the deep state, or global criminal syndicates.

Furthermore, the CIA and other intelligence agencies have openly admitted to no less than 81 regime change operations over the past 100 years, but there are likely far more than this. Many of these involved lying, stealing, cheating, and openly killing targets, as well as, in some cases, elected officials. The Frank Church hearings revealed that the CIA also developed an undetectable heart attack gun, capable of killing nearly any target without revealing the identity of the perpetrator.

Source

Ironically, the intelligence agencies that support the mass media, which have been emphatic about the need to defend democracy, have arguably been the single largest contributor to undemocratic regime change and operations in the last 100 years.

In other words, there are enough admitted murders committed by political actors to support the theoretical plausibility of Joe Biden's assassination. Regardless of whether Biden's assassination occurs overtly, covertly, or through characterological methods, the outcome remains the same.

I would argue that we already have enough proof to confirm the fact that a character assassination of Biden is already underway, as evidenced by the media lockstep to finally acknowledge Biden’s cognitive decline. This same media worked hard to gaslight America and the world about it prior to the debate in late June 2024. Both of these things provide evidence for the fact that the intelligence agencies are pulling the strings behind the scenes.

TESTIMONIAL: “I’ve taken fulvic in the past and it did not show results like yours !! I've only had it for about ten days and what a difference it's made in my gut/digestive health! I'm regular, less bloated and haven't had stomach pain from excessive acid like I normally do! I really feel it healing my insides!!”

MUST HAVE DETOX POWERHOUSE: Fight viruses, remove heavy metals and microplastics, and restore your gut all at once with Humic and Fulvic Acid from Ascent Nutrition. 

Save 10% and get free shipping with a subscription!

Buy Humic and Fulvic Acid

Would they ever do this to a sitting president?

Two of the four presidents that were assassinated in the US have ties to intelligence agencies that I personally know of.

1. Abraham Lincoln (1865): Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth, a Confederate sympathizer and likely British intelligence agent.

   1. Booth became involved in Mazzini's Young America movement as a teenager and joined the Knights of the Golden Circle in 1858.

2. John F. Kennedy (1963): Kennedy was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald, a falsely claimed lone gunman.

   1. From the late 1950s, when the CIA recruited him from the Marine Corps, until his murder on November 24, 1963, by Dallas nightclub owner Jack Ruby, Lee Harvey Oswald was employed by the CIA, FBI, Army, and undoubtedly Naval Intelligence.

Despite official history, there is a widespread belief that the CIA played a role in JFK's death, or at the very least, that they attempted to conceal the truth about his murder. Furthermore, the CIA files have remained classified for far longer than the alleged justified reason of maintaining operational security during active operations. Nearly everyone who was alive when that event took place is long dead.

To further emphasize the points above about narrative warfare, the very fact that there’s so much interest in declassifying the JFK files proves the power of narrative as a tool for influencing the beliefs and values of citizens. For most people, if it didn’t appear on the news or have peer-reviewed status, it probably isn’t true.

The same people who believe that the intelligence agencies don’t have a role to play in these things are often the same people who believed Joe Biden was, and still is, a capable and competent president who isn’t experiencing cognitive decline.

The other reason the deep state might be considering assassination is that it fits their occult religion that appears to revere human sacrifice. There are multiple credible claims that suggest the dark occult forces that gave rise to the deep state believe in black magic and its power to alter events in their favor. The September 11th, 2001, attacks were arguably a form of chaos sorcery, which is based on the idea that by introducing chaos, the energy released therefrom can be used to guide and shape events towards achieving an agenda. Whether there’s any truth to the magical aspect, there is validity to the ability to reshape society by introducing chaos, as we’ve seen with COVID and the Great Reset agenda.

Now that the plausibility of the assassination of Joe Biden has been well demonstrated, let’s consider what benefits would be garnered from doing so.

Biden Can’t Be Replaced That Easily

Biden has openly stated several times that he’s staying in the race. He recently sent a letter to Democrats urging them to rally behind him and that he has no intention of stepping down. That being said, I don’t necessarily believe Biden is acting independently. I suspect that Biden is being used to build tension and help rally support for whatever dramatic solution is coming down the pike.

As was detailed at length in the article Biden Replacement Process: The Rules, Timeline, Contenders, and Polls | ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW they can’t force him to step down.

• The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is empowered to replace a presidential nominee, but only if the candidate voluntarily steps down.

• Biden is polling the best out of all the would-be democratic replacements, believe it or not.

• Most of the popularly named replacements, like Michelle Obama, Gavin Newsom, and Gretchen Whitmer, have openly stated they don’t want to run, some saying, because they know Trump will win.

• The Democratic Party is in shambles as many have openly called for Biden to be replaced, with others staunchly supporting him.

• The Biden-Harris campaign war chest can’t be easily shifted to another set without those candidates stepping down.

• Shifting public support in a productive form from an aging Joe Biden, despite what’s happened, is challenging due to the rifts in public opinion.

All of these concerns have to be addressed in a way that materially translates into coherent, popular, and actionable support. The sudden and jarring death of Joe Biden could produce that effect while also helping to take the wind out of Trump’s sails.

Benefits of Doing Away With Biden

Here are some reasons why assassinating Biden might produce benefits for the deep state.

• Assassinations tend to act as galvanizing events that can mobilize a tremendous amount of energy and ammunition for narrative-stirring operations (e.g., Archduke Franz Ferdinand’s assassination helped start WWI).

• Assassinations act as mass collective trauma. It would help unify the democratic base while also providing a large reservoir of media coverage the deep state can use for a host of narrative operations (i.e., PSYOPs).

• Additionally the trauma would be like the September 11th attacks, providing a significant distraction from Trump and the America First agenda. With this, major leaps in the deep state’s agenda could be accomplished, especially those Trump has made difficult with his America first rhetoric.

• It would unite the Democratic Party in another way by fostering a shared sense of sorrow that builds camaraderie, eliciting a subdued yet remorseful sense of relief at the resolution of the Biden problem. For this reason, the pressure and tension to get rid of Biden must be built up by exposing his failings, like we’ve seen after the debate.

• The outpouring of sympathy and intense emotions would be used to rally support behind whoever replaces Biden.

• Biden’s replacement would be turned into a hero who is carrying on Biden’s legacy of fighting climate change, white supremacy (in Trump et al), and various other globalist talking points.

• It would make it difficult for Trump to talk about Biden as the worst and most corrupt president in history.

• Trump would need to quickly find a new antagonist to mobilize against, which would be difficult with only a few months before the election. At the same time, the Democrats could use all of Trump’s brashness toward Biden mobilize their own antagonist narrative with Trump in the starring role of villain.

• It would provide cover for Biden’s globalist corruption and the damage the administration has caused domestically and abroad.

• It would make it impolite and politically incorrect for the general population to talk negatively about his globalist policies, like open borders, climate change, inflation, the Ukraine War, and so on. These policies would be enshrined as a fallen hero’s legacy.

• It would be better than using the 25th Amendment to remove Biden, which would further drive a wedge in the Democratic Party and increase the sense of embarrassment for those who denied his decline for so long.

• All those who feel embarrassed for denying Biden's cognitive decline could feel somewhat vindicated for supporting a POTUS just before their assassination, due to the collective trauma.

• It would make Biden seem like a fallen hero, placing him alongside some of the most revered presidents in history, such as Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy.

• It would help rally support in the form of donations for whoever takes Biden’s place.

There are likely other reasons I haven’t identified that might be at play.

Why Not Remove Biden via the 25th Amendment

Wouldn’t it be easier to get rid of Biden via the 25th Amendment?

The 25th Amendment of the United States Constitution consists of four sections, each addressing different scenarios related to presidential succession and disability:

• Section 1 states: "In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President."

• Section 2 states: "Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress."

• Section 3 states: "Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President."

• Section 4 states: "Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President."

Pro Tempore means for the time being.

Section 4 is the most relevant to our question. It has never been implemented to date, but it provides a process for removing a president when others believe he is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office." This section allows for the Vice President, along with a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, to transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. In this case, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

From a political influence and rallying-party perspective, the deep state might find it more difficult to pull this off. However, since Biden is clearly unfit, it’s highly likely the effort would succeed. In my opinion, doing so will not favor the Democrats or the globalist agenda, because it seems desperate and offers only a few of the benefits previously discussed. It would also validate what Trump and others have been saying since Biden started running in 2019—that he’s not fit to be president and never was.

The new candidate will seem like a hero, but in a way, that’s like someone coming in to save a failing business or restaurant; it’s still a failure, and a new face doesn’t automatically reverse that sentiment in the public’s eye. Furthermore, as long as Biden persists in his refusal to step down, the party remains divided, and I doubt that the establishment Democrats, such as Nancy Pelosi, Gavin Newsom, and others, who have shown irrational support for him, will readily switch. If they did, they would look flakey and like their abandoning ship, another bad look for the party in general during an election season. I think it makes more sense to have supported the 25th Amendment from the start if they planned to remove Biden.

The fact there wasn’t a more unified front to replace Biden after the debate is, in part, why I suspect a more dramatic solution is coming down the pike. While an overt assassination might not be coming, a covert natural yet dramatic death could do the job and provide a good amount of the benefits listed above.

This is what I’ve considered thus far. There are, of course, always new and creative ways the intelligence-backed deep state can sell people on their narratives, although they seem to be less effective than they used to be.

What If Biden Dies of Natural Causes?

Biden's death could appear to be due to natural causes. This would accomplish many of the goals they likely have in mind. The intelligence agencies have the technology to assassinate Biden and make it seem like a natural death event.

The deep state has apparently used car accidents, suicides, and other seemingly “normal” things that cause people to die.

If Biden did get overtly assassinated, a fair number of people would probably suspect players in the Democratic Party. Making it look like a natural event would help avoid this suspicion.

An overt assassination provides additional benefits that a natural death would not provide.

Why Wouldn’t They Assassinate Biden?

I assume there are numerous reasons why an overt assassination might not be the best course of action for the deep state. They could avoid suspicion. If the top Democrats don't show enough obligatory remorse, it could potentially reflect negatively on them. This factor alone might cause them to abandon the killing of the king ritual.

Trump and the patriots might also have ways of spying on their scheming that would put the whole operation on display in a way that makes it not worth it. The deep state does appear to be desperate, enough so, they pulled the switch on COVID for the last election. That desperation might be enough to consider what we’ve been exploring in this article.

Narrative Seeding: How do you get the left to go along with a dramatic solution for the Joe Biden problem?

Let me attempt to sum up the mechanics of how the powers that be use narrative seeding, identity politics, and dogmatic beliefs (extrinsic knowledge) to their advantage. What I’m about to explain will pull back the curtain and reveal how the hidden hands of power shape civilization, provided the population can be dumbed down and not use their God-given powers of reason, logic, and critical thinking.

As I explain this, keep in mind that we are now witnessing a system update regarding Joe Biden, who has been a key piece on the societal chessboard and a central figure in the identity politics of social and cultural control.

We know for a fact that narratives have been used for building and maintaining the compartmentalized civilizations that have gained prominence in the world over recorded history. We know this because every large-scale and small-scale civilization has a coherent and well-developed cultural story or narrative at its center, such as Christianity or Islam, for instance. Over the past two millennia, these two great faiths have given rise to powerful civilizations, partly due to their effective means of managing the beliefs, values, interests, and activities of their adherents. We're discussing tribal psychology and sociology, enduring powers that even contemporary individuals can't evade. Perhaps one day these influences won't dominate us as much, but for now, if we want to improve the world, we must participate, and I believe Trump and the patriots are doing just that.

In modern times, narratives are seeded into the population to create competing sects and tribes that can be controlled or manipulated from behind the scenes using intelligence agencies and their basket of sophisticated tools. A belief or value acts like a stone cast into a still pool of water, rippling through the general population to create different sects and augmenting the tribes as people decide what their response to that belief or value is. Events, narratives, and stories act like delivery mechanisms. These tribal identities, for example, are conservative and republican, liberal and democrat, or pro-Trump and anti-Trump. When a seeded narrative instills a belief or value in the entire population, it creates invisible yet powerful social membranes or identities (tribal territories), leading people to congregate around specific identity frameworks that naturally align with similar beliefs and values.

You'll naturally feel more at home with America First conservatives if you believe in patriotism, the corruption in modern society, and the suppression of our freedoms. Ever notice that a school lunchroom, for instance, naturally creates divisions along different lines of belief, value, and status, such as geek or jock, girl or boy, and so on? When these identity groupings butt up against each other, there’s heightened activity, like political battle lines. A sports game within a large stadium might be the most glaring example, with fans of one team casting social stones at the opposing team’s fan base via loud opinions, name-calling, and possibly physical displays.

Popular figures like Biden or Trump act like a steering mechanism, shaping the beliefs or values of the group for which they act as figureheads. These popular figures mobilize the group in a manner similar to how a sail captures the wind on a sailboat. When in the wrong hands, they have the power to ignite wars, drive individuals insane by juggling multiple tribal identities, split families, and ultimately transform civilization into a prison or concentration camp, ensnaring citizens in pointless and trivial disputes. The elite who rule these divided and conquered populations, on the other hand, spend their time carefully strategizing how to manage the distracted and enslaved populations.

Dogma mobilizes groupthink within a segmented tribal population. The globalists create compartmentalized tribal layers from the lowest to the highest parts of the population pyramid we call modern society; all those with left-leaning anti-Trump sentiments are what we’re talking about. Currently, these layers unite under the banner of stopping Donald J. Trump from winning the 2024 election, despite their many conflicting political views. They use the narrative that portrays Trump as the ultimate adversary and villain, willing to do anything in desperation to prevent his victory. Their intense motivation to stop Trump led them to convince most Americans that there was no election fraud in the 2020 election, effectively ignoring legitimate claims of cheating. This intense motivation to stop Trump has also led them to justify illegal immigration, deny the horrors of the COVID-19 pandemic, ignore LGBTQ+ insanity, and many other aspects of the globalist agenda. Political dogma and extrinsic knowledge, which demands compliance under the penalty of ostratization, glues these layers together.

Extrinsic knowledge is a belief that is accepted as true without critical assessment or investigation. Conversely, intrinsic knowledge is something you’ve personally assessed and proven to be true using your own mind, providing a nuanced perspective. If I tell you 2 + 2 equals 4 and you blindly believe me, that belief is extrinsic knowledge. If you do the math yourself, then that belief transforms into intrinsic knowledge. Hence, there is a good form of dogma (true beliefs) that should always be critically examined so it turns into the stuff of true empowerment, intrinsic knowledge. Anything someone believes to be true that hasn’t been vetted by them personally using valid evidence and logic, creates extrinsic knowledge.

In terms of tribal psychology, beliefs and values act like social glue and in-group boundaries. You need to display the belief of the group to gain acceptance and feel belonging. The belief in something you don’t really know to be true causes a schism in the mind, especially when that belief is actually untrue. It cuts the believer off from reality because you’re shifting your identity towards unreality. This makes that person easier to control through their irrational need to believe in the false dogma and maintain the social connections based on that false dogma. This is precisely how a cult maintains such powerful control over its members, because questioning the belief means being punished or kicked out of the cult. Questioning the beliefs of the cult also feels like a betrayal, making the questioner isolated because the thing that connects them to that social group is being questioned.

Identity politics requires vehement belief in the ideology of the tribal group it belongs to. For instance, the leftist narratives and tribal identity groups centered around the transgender agenda irrationally believe that a man can be a woman just because he says so. This belief acts like a badge of honor and a ticket of admission for the tribal groups that subscribe to it. Brandishing your tribal badge in the form of a pride flag, for instance, lets other members of the tribe know they’re with “their people.”

If you're in a deep state using dogma, extrinsic beliefs, and compartmentalized tribes, your goals should be to: a) persuade people to believe in things they haven't vetted as true (extrinsic knowledge), b) make questioning the beliefs a cardinal sin for the group, and c) maintain control over the group by appointing experts or figureheads who lead the dogmatic herd like a shepherd leads his flock. This also means that if you want to change the figurehead, you need a good, emotionally compelling narrative to convey the new beliefs and bind the herd as a result. What better way to deal with a dramatic event like the death of a sitting president?

A killing of the king event is one of the most effective ways to install a new leader, while also galvanizing the people and reinvigorating the beliefs and values that keep the group together. From a trauma-based control perspective, the trauma leads to the collapse of a person's belief system, prompting them to seek new programming from the controller to reestablish stability.

I suspect the fact that it’s now socially acceptable for people to talk about Biden’s cognitive decline means that there’s a narrative-changing energy building. These narrative shifts seem to work like static electricity. Just like you can drag your feat on the carpet with wool socks to build up a charge, the new seeded narrative that Biden is a liability in the quest to defeat Trump is gaining momentum. A tension is building among the people who are horribly addicted to the deep state narratives and dogmas they've built their identity around. When the globalists unveil the catalyzing event they have been developing, the static charge will release, releasing the tension and crystallizing the new identity for the post-Biden solution.

This catalyzing event could be the death of Joe Biden, either an overt or covert assassination. Of course, there are other ways they could achieve the same effect; we’re just focusing on this theory to help illustrate the points I’ve been making throughout this article.

To get all the different layers of the globalist civilization on board, they need to experience the tension (the charge) of Biden being a liability. It's similar to how an animal trainer uses hunger to foster a bond between the animal and the person feeding it. The same type of tension is the need to stop Trump at all costs. For a dogmatically led person, the ends justify the means; a horrible tragedy, no matter how terrible, justifies the tragedy if it leads to a desirable outcome.

How could they do it?

Recall those mainstream motives from above. The intelligence community is made up of experts at manufacturing trained killers who often don’t realize they are being groomed for such a role. They use ideological grooming, cult-like tactics, entrapment, and no doubt other sophisticated methods that would make it fairly easy to pull off. For instance, we have good reason to suspect that many of the mass shootings we've witnessed over the years involved perpetrators groomed via MK-Ultra methods, likely involving powerful psychiatric pharmaceuticals.

Technically, the details aren’t that hard to imagine; it’s the narrative warfare angle that I think requires more care on their part so that it has the intended political effect.

• A Trump-Supporter: They could make it look like a rightwing lunatic Trump supporter killed Biden, which would have a lot of benefits insofar as narrative warfare. This would affect Trump’s image in the public eye, advance the MAGA domestic extremist narratives they’ve been cultivating, and likely have many other narrative warfare benefits.

• Angry Palestine Supporter: They could make it look like a left-wing anti-Israel supporter killed Biden. This would help advance the narrative warfare regarding the WWIII Israel-Palestine conflict; it would likely be readily accepted by evangelicals who already believe the end times are upon us; and there are no doubt other benefits.

• Disaffected American Worker Theory: They could make it look like an angry business owner or victim of illegal immigrant crime killed Biden, partially fueled by Trump’s “hateful white supremacist rhetoric.”

• Crazy Illegal Immigrant Theory: They could make it look like an illegal immigrant killed Biden.

These are just a handful of the examples I could think of.

If the deep state did want to make this happen, they no doubt have much more sophisticated ways of manufacturing a narrative that would suit their plans.

Closing Thoughts

Again, I’m not in favor of the overt assassination theory, I’m just giving voice to it.

I do think some kind of dramatic solution is being planned, which is my current theory of choice.

How else can they get rid of Biden, rally support behind a new candidate, unite the party, and make a decisive blow against Trump?

Let me know your thoughts in the comments.

Please tell me what you think or let me know if I got something wrong. I want to hear from you.

Much love,

Justin Deschamps is a researcher, omniologist, podcaster, and business consultant who has committed himself to restoring the knowledge, reason, and goodwill that helped the founding fathers create the greatest nation on earth.