Spot On Justin. Saving the MOHAP for last. I expect the Rejection of the Trans Narrative (Bud Light) will extend to Big Mike. The Deep State can no longer hide the data since too many other platforms, not under their control, has formed. Enjoying the Show.
Still concerned about the 1937 Joe Brandt vision/dream since too many details point to our time. Since nothing occurred last early spring, then one must look ahead to the next early spring. Trump will be in office then. If the World earthquake happens and PANIC looting occurs in the cities, then Marshal Law will be implemented. At that point many "Fixes" can be made. Unsealing of Indictments can occur. Buckle Up for Early Spring.
Thanks for this Justin. I appreciate your analysis of the unfolding saga of US politics.
Being an Aussie, I have a certain detachment, (and perhaps, morbid curiosity), about the striving and sacrifice of modern American people.
We all play a role our cultural, as well as our individual evolution.
I appreciate your analysis of the psyop against devout democrats, by positioning Mr Biden as the only presidential hopeful, despite his obvious cognitive decline.
Your identification of the double bind dilemma, of processing two or more conflicting messages encouraged me to consider how to reconsider our conventional responses of looking for someone to blame.
The conventional approach is to remain at the level of the cogintive dilemma which, due to the 'rational impasse', triggers a painful emotional response.
The thoughts that follow relate more to the feelings than to the actual situation.
The effort to rationalise the painful feelings can produce various thought paterns depending on the psychological 'state' of the individual.
Your example of a double bind, where a child deals with mixed messages, is a useful example of how parents can project their traumatic psychological states onto their offspring, thus maintaining generational, emotional trauma.
I am reminded of a book that I read in the late 1970s by a Scottish psychiatrist, R. D. Laing.
I was intrigued by Laing's insights into the complexities of mental illness.
Your references to psyops within psyops reminded me of the mental gymnastics required to make meaning of his work.
Tellingly, this book, titled 'Knots', has an introduction by Melvin Maddocks from The Christian Science Monitor; "The voices of known demons rise from these pages: demons of guilt, demons of self-justification; demons of perverse will, demons of self-destruction. All the enemies of the human spirit are arrayed here as vividly, as warningly as in a medieval morality play. Those who believe that to unmask the enemy is a first step toward confounding him will find this a practical as well as a moral book."
This summary fails to identify the true nature the 'demon' forces that 'confound' human relationships - but he does identify some of the processes (guilt, self-justification, perverse will, self-destruction) that maintain confusion within the human soul. (I use the term 'soul' to represent the physical/emotional/rational being of an individual during their life)
When individuals begin to consider the relational dynamics of observations/perceptions, thoughts and feelings with the same astuteness that is currently applied to physics, we may be able to identify the 'demons' that have historically been projected out into the world around us.
As long as a distressed child, (or adult for that matter) can only blame themself or the other person or thing for their painful feelings the generational trauma will continue.
This idea in itself can create the emotional distress of a double bind and can be understood as a manifestation of cognitive dissonance.
The resolution of this dissonance is heartening ♡
Mr Trump and Mr Biden are artifacts of a culture that wants to be led to freedom...
Considering this leads to another example of cognitive dissonance.
While political conversations can maintain connection between traumatised people, they remain in the realm of the 'problem'.
I'm pretty sure that the answers we seek are not political. ♡
Spot On Justin. Saving the MOHAP for last. I expect the Rejection of the Trans Narrative (Bud Light) will extend to Big Mike. The Deep State can no longer hide the data since too many other platforms, not under their control, has formed. Enjoying the Show.
Good to hear from you QoatHerder. Your article on the eclipse was great. Keep up the Great Work.
Still concerned about the 1937 Joe Brandt vision/dream since too many details point to our time. Since nothing occurred last early spring, then one must look ahead to the next early spring. Trump will be in office then. If the World earthquake happens and PANIC looting occurs in the cities, then Marshal Law will be implemented. At that point many "Fixes" can be made. Unsealing of Indictments can occur. Buckle Up for Early Spring.
That was fantastic. I agree on all of it ... now that I know about it. Your report filled in the blanks. Amazing storyline they'll presenting. Insane.
Hey Justin, just fantastic writing. I remember you mentioning you were writing a book? Where can we learn more about when it’ll be available?
Hey Nathan. I'm writing it now and I'll be promoting it through the substack here.
Thanks for this Justin. I appreciate your analysis of the unfolding saga of US politics.
Being an Aussie, I have a certain detachment, (and perhaps, morbid curiosity), about the striving and sacrifice of modern American people.
We all play a role our cultural, as well as our individual evolution.
I appreciate your analysis of the psyop against devout democrats, by positioning Mr Biden as the only presidential hopeful, despite his obvious cognitive decline.
Your identification of the double bind dilemma, of processing two or more conflicting messages encouraged me to consider how to reconsider our conventional responses of looking for someone to blame.
The conventional approach is to remain at the level of the cogintive dilemma which, due to the 'rational impasse', triggers a painful emotional response.
The thoughts that follow relate more to the feelings than to the actual situation.
The effort to rationalise the painful feelings can produce various thought paterns depending on the psychological 'state' of the individual.
Your example of a double bind, where a child deals with mixed messages, is a useful example of how parents can project their traumatic psychological states onto their offspring, thus maintaining generational, emotional trauma.
I am reminded of a book that I read in the late 1970s by a Scottish psychiatrist, R. D. Laing.
I was intrigued by Laing's insights into the complexities of mental illness.
Your references to psyops within psyops reminded me of the mental gymnastics required to make meaning of his work.
Tellingly, this book, titled 'Knots', has an introduction by Melvin Maddocks from The Christian Science Monitor; "The voices of known demons rise from these pages: demons of guilt, demons of self-justification; demons of perverse will, demons of self-destruction. All the enemies of the human spirit are arrayed here as vividly, as warningly as in a medieval morality play. Those who believe that to unmask the enemy is a first step toward confounding him will find this a practical as well as a moral book."
This summary fails to identify the true nature the 'demon' forces that 'confound' human relationships - but he does identify some of the processes (guilt, self-justification, perverse will, self-destruction) that maintain confusion within the human soul. (I use the term 'soul' to represent the physical/emotional/rational being of an individual during their life)
When individuals begin to consider the relational dynamics of observations/perceptions, thoughts and feelings with the same astuteness that is currently applied to physics, we may be able to identify the 'demons' that have historically been projected out into the world around us.
As long as a distressed child, (or adult for that matter) can only blame themself or the other person or thing for their painful feelings the generational trauma will continue.
This idea in itself can create the emotional distress of a double bind and can be understood as a manifestation of cognitive dissonance.
The resolution of this dissonance is heartening ♡
Mr Trump and Mr Biden are artifacts of a culture that wants to be led to freedom...
Considering this leads to another example of cognitive dissonance.
While political conversations can maintain connection between traumatised people, they remain in the realm of the 'problem'.
I'm pretty sure that the answers we seek are not political. ♡