Coincidences within Coincidences: The Silent War Against Children

The age old belief in draining the youth—traces of the death cult.

We’re told that there’s no such thing as an ancient death cult that abuses children in horrific ways as a matter of a twisted faith and deranged culture. We’re told that if it did happen, it was long ago, and we’re oh so much more “evolved” and “civilized” today.

We’re told that it’s all a “crazy conspiracy theory” that only idiots believe.

These are the same “debunkers” who invoke Halon’s Razor, which states:

"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

In my view, this is a logical fallacy. (Read why here)

It’s an extremely effective mechanism to convince otherwise intelligent people there’s no such thing as a global cult of child sex abuse. But after what you’re about to read, I challenge you to prove otherwise.

Psychologically, most people don’t want to consider the horrific reality of extremely disturbing child abuse. The sheer magnitude of a thousand-year tradition of torture and cannibalism seems “to wild to believe.” But epistemologically, incredulity is not a valid basis of refutation—just because something seems too crazy to be true, doesn’t mean it is indeed untrue.

In reality, no claim can be properly debunked without a complete and comprehensive examination.

Only after truly, honesty, and completely examining the evidence, produced by the claimant and by performing one’s own honest and exhaustive investigation, can one reasonably argue that something is indeed “not true.”

But even here, the absence of evidence is not proof of non-existence—unless, one has looked everywhere and every-when, which any honest and reasonable investigator knows is a difficult thing to do.

I ask you: how many “coincidences” is enough to honestly ask the question: maybe there’s something to this theory.

There are “plans within plans” to quote Frank Herbert. And there are “coincidences within coincidences.”

But amid all wriggling and avoidance, the irrationality masquerading as “debunking” there is the one, infinite, and everlasting truth.

Few men have the courage to seek.

Few men have the faith to find it.

And few men are brave enough to follow it wherever it leads.

But those who do, often come to similar well substantiated conclusions. Some of those men founded the country I’m living in now, the United States of America.

One of these conclusions deals with the apparent truth of a theistic universe. Another relates to the well hidden death and child abuse cult that, apparently, has successfully remained obscured for a very long time.

Many who dismiss these notions out of hand either refuse to honestly investigate or don’t know how. They cite “experts” who apparently “did the checking for them.”

For my part, I attempt to follow the data I research using established rational methods. I have come to call this Omniology, a branch of epistemology.

It is the “study of everything.” Of course, I am not omniscient. But I do employ a multi-varient methodology—I study every possible interpretation of the available data to see which which theory developed therefrom has the best explanatory power.

In the past, theory, science, or explanation’s accuracy is measured by how well it incorporates the observed and available data. Today, we’re told that “fact checkers” did the work for us. And to question them, is hateful and racist.

I cannot claim absolute certainty. I only claim that I have attempted to refute the claim of this abuse cult, and I have been unsuccessful.

Perhaps you can do a better job than I have.

The Evidence: Eating Babies andChild Sacrifice; the Old and the New

I give you a small taste of the large volumes of data points that point to the long-standing presence of something truly unimaginably horrific, and yet, apparently real.

Here is one example. There are various sculptures, usually adorning facades of ornate homes, mansions and buildings, that employ children, images of horned devils and figures, and more.

Here’s a few on the Baltimore, the largest mansion in the United States. These are just a few images I could find online. When I visited, there were owls and other horned figures.

Here’s what is probably one of the more blatant creations.

Kindlifresserbrunnen (German for: Child eater fountain) They say that the true meaning of this 500 year old statute is a mystery.

Is this just a coincidence or is there something more insidious going on?

From History Depends on the Historian, quora.com:

The Kindlifresserbrunnen: The Mysterious Child-Eating Statue of Bern

The Kindlifresserbrunnen, also known as the Child Eater Fountain, is a mysterious statue located in Bern, Switzerland. This peculiar fountain has been intriguing visitors for nearly 500 years, as its central figure depicts a man devouring a child. While the true meaning behind this statue remains unknown, there are several theories that attempt to shed light on its existence.

One theory suggests that the Kindlifresserbrunnen serves as a warning against immoral behavior or as a reminder of the consequences of sin. During the medieval times, when the statue was created in the 16th century, public executions and harsh punishments were common. The statue's depiction of a child being consumed could have been intended to frighten and deter children from misbehaving or straying from the righteous path.

Another theory proposes that the sculpture represents a pagan custom or folklore. In ancient times, child sacrifice was practiced in some cultures as an offering to appease gods or supernatural beings. The Kindlifresserbrunnen might serve as a symbolic representation of these ancient rituals, serving as a reminder of the dark practices that humanity has evolved from.

Additionally, it is possible that the statue has a more practical purpose. It has been suggested that the Kindlifresserbrunnen was created as a form of social commentary, criticizing the corrupt and oppressive ruling elites of the time. The figure of the child eater could symbolize the ruling class consuming the innocence and potential of the common people, reflecting the discontent and grievances of the lower classes.

Despite these theories, the true meaning and purpose of the Kindlifresserbrunnen remain shrouded in mystery. It continues to captivate and intrigue visitors, serving as a reminder of the enigmatic and sometimes macabre aspects of our shared history.

Is this just a coincidence or is there something more insidious going on?

Statistically, there are far too many accounts of child-abusing, killing, eating, and sacrificing cults throughout history to dismiss this as some "weird fascination of the wealthy."

***

From Child Sacrifice in the Western World, By David Miedema:

In my recent studies of history and anthropology I have found reference in many cultures to child sacrifice. These cultures include many far-flung groups that are distinct in geography, worldview, and mythology. A few examples include the Mayans, Incas, and Aztecs of South America. On the other side of the world, examples are found in several cultures of the Middle East, such as the Canaanites, the Edomites, and occasionally the Hebrews. These cultures performed child sacrifice to placate or pacify a deity in exchange for continued services, such as keeping the sun in the sky or bringing rain for the coming growing season. The common factor is that the society sacrificed children for the sake of individual and communal health and wealth.

I intend to show that the majority of abortion decisions today are made for these same reasons, and that abortion is morally equivalent to child sacrifice. In order to understand the nature of the ancient practices, one must understand the mindset of those tribes that participated in these acts. As many people know, several South American cultures held ritual games to determine who would be sacrificed. What many do not know is that, in at least half of the cultures, it was the

winners of the games who won the right to be sacrificed. In short, these peoples viewed it as an honor to become a sacrifice; furthermore, it was a great privilege to give up one’s children for this cause. In some South American cultures the sacrifices were annual, whereas the details in certain Middle-Eastern cultures varied.

Some gods, such as Molech, required child sacrifice on a frequent (almost daily) basis, whereas others (such as Baal) required this annually. This was the people’s worship to their gods, and they expected to be rewarded. The cultures were convinced that by sacrificing their children “their lives would be better.” (Haviland, et al, 2005).

At the time of Columbus and the early Spanish colonization, the ritual practice of human sacrifice had almost completely disappeared from Western European society. This was arguably associated with the rise of Christianity, which consistently finds such practices abominable. So when explorers arrived in the lower Americas, the practice of human sacrifice (particularly child sacrifice) horrified them. It so offended Western sensibility that the reaction by the Spaniards was to forcibly root it out of native society. It was the practice of slaughtering innocent children that was most anathema to the European mentality. Strangely, it seems that these practices might not have been so offensive if they had been confined to a group’s enemies, or even to the adults within a group that would consent to their own sacrifice. Additionally, these were not antinomian societies. In fact, the societies were highly organized, and established severe punishment for crimes such as murder. Yet they faithfully performed and volunteered for the ritual sacrifices (Haviland, et al, 2005).

***

The following paper details many many examples in history, this is only an excerpt.

From, Child Sacrifice in the Ancient Near and Middle East, by Jason Tatlock:

Take, for instance, the building sacrifices from Hattusha discussed by Neve 1996, or the cases referenced in Moses 2012, Starr 1939, Tobler 1950, and Tsuneki 2022 at Çatalhöyük, Nuzi, Tepe Gawra, and Tell el-Kerkh, respectively. A sacrificial interpretation necessitates the fundamental supposition that individuals were purposefully killed with the aim of incorporating their remains into building projects. While this is a valid perspective, it is also possible (albeit less likely) that individuals died of nonsacrificial means and were then placed into structures. Sacrifice versus nonsacrifice is also at stake with contemporaneous burials of more than one being at Umm el-Marra, a site analyzed in Schwartz 2012. As for texts about burning children from the Neo-Assyrian period, the Akkadian passages describe the practice with the language of penalties. These penalties explain that children should be burned to various deities as punishment of the parents. The burning process is best understood in a sacrificial manner, which is how Smith 1975 reads the penalties, but it is not unanimously viewed as such. Instead of child sacrifice, an alternative perspective seen in Weinfeld 1972 is that children were to be dedicated to meet these penalties.

***

Paul Joseph Watson recently produced an update about Jefferey Epstein, including a fascinating segment that alludes to a connection between Epstein, Bill Gates, and an ancient pedophile cult known as the Cult of Inanna.

The segment begins near 8:00.

Wealthy and prominent occultists believed for centuries that sexual contact with minors imparts energy that can lengthen their lives.

Stanley Kubrick used the The Unexplained File: Book Cult & Occult, which was part of his archives, as a basis and inspiration for his last film, Eyes Wide Shut.

Eyes Wide Shut was filmed in a Rothschild Manson

Mentmore Towers

Mentmore Towers, historically known simply as "Mentmore", is a 19th-century English country house built between 1852 and 1854 for the Rothschild family in the village of Mentmore in Buckinghamshire. Sir Joseph Paxton and his son-in-law, George Henry Stokes,^[1][2] designed the building in the 19th-century revival of late 16th and early 17th-century Elizabethan and Jacobean styles called Jacobethan.^[3][4] The house was designed for the banker and collector of fine art Baron Mayer de Rothschild as a country home, and as a display case for his collection of fine art. The mansion has been described as one of the greatest houses of the Victorian era.^[5][6] Mentmore was inherited by Hannah Primrose, Countess of Rosebery, née Rothschild, and owned by her descendants, the Earls of Rosebery. (Source)

We also know that various groups throughout history (Assyrians, Ba'al Worshipers, and in more modern times, the Dönmeh, and allegedly Aleister Crowley) believed that sacrificing children imparted power to the one performing the act.

“A white male child of perfect innocence and intelligence makes the most suitable victim.”

— Aleister Crowley

Robert Sepehr's work on the Sabbatean's (1666) and the Frankists (1770) discussed a modern sect of Reformists that believed "Redemption Through Sin" was an essential part of restoring the world back to a pre-fallen state.

***

Recently, there are many "conspiracy theories" that deal with abusing children, drinking their adrenaline-laden blood), and otherwise "stealing the life force" of minors to extend life.

Could ‘young’ blood stop us getting old? (link)

***

Whatever your views on circumcision are, one cannot rationally deny the unethical basis of cutting off the skin of an infant, in my view.

If it’s undesirable for young girls to be “circumcised” why is it OK as a medically sanctioned practice in other parts of the world?

This was, and still is, justified as a religious ritual.

In today’s world of transgenderism and the large-scale worldwide effort to normalize child and young adult multination, in the name of “changing genders,” the once obscured ethical lines are less blurry.

CNN: Circumcision study halted due to trauma (source)

Are Celebrities Getting Foreskin Facials?

***

These are just a handful of verifiable examples.

We also know that Jeffrey Epstein (who didn't kill himself) was part of a sophisticated global blackmail ring, designed to entrap upper class low-level elites, who once compromised, would do the bidding of their hidden masters.

Jeffrey Epstein Reportedly Tried Blackmailing Bill Gates Over Affair (link)

The Most Attacked Man in History

One man has dared to confront the people who push porn onto our children and go after child abusers with Presidential power, and for his bravery, he is the single most attacked man in human history.

Rumble link

Just another coincidence?

Final Thoughts

Statistically, any scientist or researcher worth their salt would investigate these claims seriously.

And yet even the most "intelligent people" continue to dismiss the situation at hand.

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs)

I didn’t include the rates of child abuse at the hands of normal every day life. But as a small sample, Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) were studied by the CDC in the mid ‘90s. They found that at least ⅔ of the population has at least one ACE, with some studies claiming up to 90% have at least on ACEs.

What’s more, the most damaging form of abuse is not emotional, verbal, physical or sexual, it’s neglect.

Neglect leaves no visible scars. It is a silent and devastating abuser, one that is unrecognized by parents in most cases and unrecognized by children who grow up and don’t understand why they are the way they are. Society has almost totally turned a blind eye to the neglect epidemic. And Big Tech has made it far more prevalent.

Most children in the technologically driven modern world spend only five hours a week having meaningful communication with their parents. And at the same time, screen time (cell phones, tablets, TV, etc) is consumed, at a minimum, of 2 hours a day and up to 7.5 hours a day.

According to All About Vision, the average screen time for children varies by age:

• 2–4 years old: 2–2.5 hours per day

• 5–8 years old: Over 3 hours per day

• 8–12 years old: Almost 5 hours per day

• Teens: Almost 7.5 hours per day (Source)

Children need what I call social nutrients: true, deep, meaningful and comprehensive discussion about life, their experiences, emotions, thoughts, and spiritual concepts of meanings and values.

Can you do the math?

We aren’t raising our children anymore; the media giants of the world are raising them for us.

Neglect + Modern Media = millions upon millions of damaged kids and people. The cost on society is incalculable.

It’s been bad for a long time. But it’s even worse now with the intensity of the sexual grooming and violence on TV and online.

But because it’s “normal” we don’t take notice in the general population. The toxicity of the situation, and how badly it’s affecting our children and and the problems they face as adults, is barely acknowledged.

The good news is most parents care about their children and would fight to protect them. It’s not a caring problem, it’s a knowledge problem.

The bad news is we’re so busy earning a living along with other modern-age distractions, we’ve let some of the most unethical and nefarious things happen all around us.

For my part, I can tell you I will do everything I can to expose this truly monstrous war against innocence.

And I will share the effective methods of restoration and prevention that I’ve stumbled upon in my quest to understand the truth in all it’s varied forms.

There’s a storm out there, and it’s time to bring our stillness.

Much love,

Justin