How the Deep State Could Win from the Trump Assassination Attempt

Barack Obama revealed the power of divide and conquer

Friends and patriots, I’ve already seen a lot of bickering about the details of Trump’s assassination, such as whether it was planned or not, whether he was wearing a bulletproof vest or not, whether the secret service was to blame or not, and so on. Obama revealed how their methods work, as I'll show you. They are using divide and conquer tactics to tear us apart, but like the founding fathers, we have the power to unite over the larger issues and confront the true threat.

Similar to the September 11th attacks, the attempted assassination of Trump on July 13th, 2024, created a global spectacle that has the power to reshape society, social groups, and even individual thoughts and attitudes about life. Trump didn’t have to die to produce the energy needed for this process. 

How The Deep State Use Events to Change Our Thoughts, Attitudes, and Our Communities

First, let's establish the science that supports what we’ve all experienced many times in life. Then I'll show you the clip in which Obama openly admits to using divide and conquer tactics.

Trump himself acknowledged the need for unity in the following post on Truth Social from Monday July the 15th, 2024.

As we move forward in Uniting our Nation after the horrific events on Saturday, this dismissal of the Lawless Indictment in Florida should be just the first step, followed quickly by the dismissal of ALL the Witch Hunts — The January 6th Hoax in Washington, D.C., the Manhattan D.A.’s Zombie Case, the New York A.G. Scam, Fake Claims about a woman I never met (a decades old photo in a line with her then husband does not count), and the Georgia “Perfect” Phone Call charges. The Democrat Justice Department coordinated ALL of these Political Attacks, which are an Election Interference conspiracy against Joe Biden’s Political Opponent, ME. Let us come together to END all Weaponization of our Justice System, and Make America Great Again!

Common Spectacles and Opinion Sharing

When events happen in our lives, we naturally want to talk about them. In doing so, we can either be drawn together or we can be driven apart. Our herd or group-minded psychology causes us to feel like we belong with the people who share our beliefs and feel the opposite with those who do not. If we allow these animalistic impulses to dominate, as we have observed in mobs or crowds, they can lead us to engage in conflict with one another. However, with the power of our God-given free will choice, we can choose to do the opposite; we can use the greater causes of seeking truth to join together. And we can unite against our true enemies, who are deep-state cheaters, fraudsters, and criminals who want to destroy freedom and healthy communities. Most importantly, we must discern and differentiate honest people with respectful disagreements from trolls and bullies who don't want to engage us fairly and respectfully. 

Let’s examine a clear example of how common spectacles can be used.

“I felt like I was getting a cold, but Agarikon stopped it in its tracks.”

Organic AGARIKON fights Viruses & Bio-warfare, and much more!

10 times more effective than ribavirin against Herpes (HSV1, HSV2), Swine flu (H1N1), Bird flu (H1N4), Pox (cowpox). Studied by the DoD for the Bioshield program. 

Get your Agarikon biodefense from Ascent Nutrition, one of the most pure and potent in the industry. 

Save 10% and get free shipping with a subscription!

Buy Agarikon Mushroom

Consider the extent to which COVID acted as a novel and potent catalyst for both division and unity. Those who believed that the COVID vaccine was beneficial for both themselves and the general public quickly adopted this belief and demanded that everyone else follow suit. Those who disagreed with this were outcast, derided, and villainized. Entire families have been divided, people have been fired from their jobs, and citizens have been denied medical care and died—all from the power of social division over the COVID event.

Several studies (here, here, and here) support what we know to be a deep part of being human. Events in life create spectacles that draw our attention, instilling the urge to share our opinions and discuss the details of what did or did not happen, what things mean, and what should be done about it. Social media itself proves this phenomenon in that we are drawn to share our opinions about things we see in the comments or by liking a post. Another example is rubbernecking, a phenomenon in which we gravitate towards individuals on the roadside to pique our curiosity about current events and engage in discussions with our friends and family. Finally, crowds gather around curiosity-provoking events because it is a part of human nature to collectively watch something, which acts as an event that makes us feel together via the common spectacle. Some examples of common spectacles are sports games, weddings, dance clubs, musical performances, and tragedies like the attempted assassination of President Donald J. Trump.

In the following clip, Barack Obama openly discusses how fake news and bad-faith actors using these common spectacles flood a nation's public square with division and bickering and ultimately break the people's ability to trust what is real. Obama focuses on the division between a people and their leaders to cause real separation. The same methods are also used to drive wedges between otherwise united people, making them easier to control because a) they have lost their ability to know what is real via fake news and b) they fight amongst each other over the opinoins generated from the “raw sewage,” as he puts it.

Source

The public square is the place where people talk about, discuss, debate, and process things that happen in their lives and in the community or nation. People typically engage in this conversation at the water cooler, dinner table, or any other place where they can freely share their opinions. And now that we’re in the age of social media, the public square is increasingly online.

By injecting fake stories, flooding the comment sections with bots and sock puppet accounts, and using the methods Obama described, the deep state can reshape a society through the way the discourse or discussion about and around an event takes place. This is how intelligence agencies work with their media partners. In the past, this took place in newspapers, on the radio, and on TV shows and news programs. Now, it happens more online than anywhere else.

How can manipulating the public square have such a powerful effect? It has to do with how we form beliefs and whether or not we critically evaluate them.

Extrinsic Knowledge, Intrinsic Knowledge, and Critical Thinking

Second, now that we’ve established the power of common spectacles to act as catalysts for personal and social change, let’s discuss the power of our response to either build unity or create divides.

Psychologically and sociologically, we know that common spectacles, especially global mega events, can be a source of change, either great unity or great division. The key is how we respond to events, which is a fundamental aspect of our God-given free will choice.

During the revolutionary war, the people were heavily divided. Many colonialists were loyal to the crown and didn’t want to rebel against King George. The events of that era served as a common spectacle—a powerful one that ultimately sparked war.

The phrase “united we stand, divided we fall” became a central pillar in the revolutionary war as patriots back then, like now, realized how important unity was to avoiding the disaster of defeat. The powers that be know how to divide and conquer. As we just discussed, people naturally share their opinions about common spectacles, carving out a place for themselves in the public square. However, if we focus only on what divides us as a way to define ourselves, then before long, the greater unity around the bigger issues will fade from view. We’ll find ourselves bickering about the nuance and details while ignoring the more important issues.

The same opportunity for division is currently unfolding around the attempted assassination of President Trump, and this is precisely what they want.

Discussion is Good and Healthy, Bickering with Intel Agents is not

Passionate, open, honest discussion is good and healthy; it is a form of intellectual intimacy that fuels unity, helps us process events, and ultimately helps us bond together. We understand how important it is for people to share and process together in order to grieve and avoid mental illness and trauma. However, when we’re driven to bicker and fight by refusing to hear out other people or allow stubborn, close-minded people to get us upset, then we can drift into division that pulls us away from each other and can ultimately be used to manipulate and divide a previously united and healthy people.

The deep state uses the internet to plant bots, sock-puppet accounts, and agents that make wild claims, spread open disinformation, make fun of, or otherwise sow division in comment sections. Recall the dead internet theory, which suggests that over half the internet isn’t even real people; it’s algorithms, bots, and non-human actors.

Here’s an example of a bot farm, one of many designed to manipulate our perceptions and beliefs through the power of social influence.

We are driven to express and shape our beliefs and opinions to gain social acceptance because we are social creatures. This happens in two powerful ways. First, we want to support the opinions we think are true and valuable. Second, we want to comment against those opinions we don't agree with. This can happen silently in the quiet of our own minds, or it can happen publicly as a comment, like, share, or display. 

This is particularly true when your belief system is more extrinsic, a topic I'll be exploring in my upcoming article on narrative seeding and groupthink. Extrinsic knowledge is something you believe is true but can’t or won't' verify using logic and evidence. When someone believes something they can’t verify, mainly because it’s popular to do so, they will be driven to accept that belief, brandish it as an opinion, and in doing so, seek acceptance or belonging with the group that believes in it.

The COVID pandemic provided an excellent case study for the power of extrinsic belief.

Millions of people believed that wearing a mask protected them from viruses and other pathogens, when, as the World Health Organization admitted, it doesn’t actually offer protection. The groupthink and mob mentality produced by believing in something you can’t verify (extrinsic knowledge) so you can fit in with the crowd is one of the most powerful agents for social change. Intrinsic knowledge, conversely, is something you believe in that you’ve critically assessed with reason, logic, and evidence. If the belief is true, critical investigation can turn the dogma of extrinsic knowledge into intrinsic knowledge, something far more useful than blind belief. If the belief is false, critical investigation can break us of the false belief that is required to fit in with the crowd, helping us gain freedom from groupthink. During COVID, those who questioned masks, did the research, and thought critically recognized that face masks offer little protection.

Intelligence agencies weaponize our powerful subconscious social drives and instincts. By commenting on social spectacles such as YouTube videos, articles, or social media posts, we naturally strive to distinguish ourselves and achieve social ascendancy. If we’re not careful, we can be driven apart and waste valuable time engaging in bad-faith conversations with people who are close-minded or who don’t actually want to discuss issues productively.

It’s one thing to engage in a healthy, open-minded discussion where two people are working together to share divergent ideas in the hopes of discovering the ultimate uniter, the truth itself. However, it’s almost entirely unproductive to argue with trolls, intel agents, bots, or close-minded people who have no interest in learning or working together. These agents of division, for lack of a better term, want to earn social rewards for making fun of people, causing people to believe in lies, and driving wedges between otherwise united people for the benefit of the powers that be.

I’ve seen people bickering about whether or not the Trump assassination attempt was planned or whether it was a divine intervention. I’ve seen people bickering about whether or not Trump was wearing a bullet-proof vest or not. I’ve seen people bickering about whether Thomas Matthew Crooks was the shooter, whether the Secret Service acted properly or was the source of the problem, and so on and so forth.

It’s our choice whether we fall into unproductive division or decide to stop engaging with people or bots that clearly have no real interest in staying unified.

We Won The Revolutionary War Through Unity

Allow me to get a bit preachy for a moment.

The founding fathers were likely dealing with the same malevolent intelligence agency divided and conquer tactics that we deal with today. They spoke openly about the need to be united on common issues while simultaneously recognizing our differences and providing respect and courtesy instead of venom and contempt for those with whom we disagree. With this focus on unity, the early American patriots defeated the British. We are in the same situation today, as the Trump-led great awakening has given rise to an explosion of patriot-minded, critical-thinking citizens who have risen from their slumber to realize the real enemy is not each other but the hidden hand of the deep state.

In a discussion, we all have a sense of when things have become unproductive. Like Lucifer did during Jesus' temptation in the desert, he sought to bicker, undermine, and divide Jesus from God through arguments over scripture. Jesus won the battle, in part, by refusing to engage with someone who, in bad faith, had no interest in discovering the truth in unity via productive discussion. Bad-faith actors, be they bots, sock puppets, or real people who’ve become possessed with the urge to win an argument no matter what (trolls), aren’t playing a game we should play. It’s like trying to play a game of poker with a cheater; you’re playing a fair game while they’re playing a dishonest one. The better choice is to walk away before we’ve bet everything we have on a losing battle. And most importantly, to remember that the real enemy is the deep state and the criminal cabal behind it, not our fellow soldiers on the digital battlefield. 

Please tell me what you think or let me know if I got something wrong. I want to hear from you.

Much love,

Justin Deschamps is a researcher, omniologist, podcaster, and business consultant who has committed himself to restoring the knowledge, reason, and goodwill that helped the founding fathers create the greatest nation on earth.