A47 Brief: Covert Moves or Broken Promises? Decoding Trump’s Epstein Strategy
Kash Patel and Pam Bondi’s mixed signals: A deliberate ploy to destabilize corrupt insiders?
More than 100 days into President Trump’s second term, the long-awaited release of Jeffrey Epstein’s explosive documents and the promised high-profile arrests remain glaringly absent, fueling frustration and a creeping disillusionment among the expectant. Is the Trump agenda faltering, or are there things happening behind the scenes that can’t be seen? Despite the apparent inaction or downplaying of officials like US Attorney General Pam Bondi or FBI Director Kash Patel, there are reasons to believe these actions are playing a role in a covert operation. There appears to be a calculated strategy to unravel the Deep State, focused on pressuring mid-level operatives to defect as their once-mighty empire fractures beneath them. This possibility, among others, will be dissected, revealing how the delay might be a meticulously crafted maneuver. Indeed, the pattern fits so well that it’s worth considering as a possibility.
On Maria Bartiromo’s Fox News show, FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino suggested there may be little evidence to dispute the official narrative of Epstein’s suicide, further dampening expectations—this seemed oddly out of character.
Why is Pam Bondi suggesting major revelations and damning information about Epstein on the one hand, while on the other, Patel and Bongino seem to be tamping things down?
This may be part of a strategy to put pressure on Deep State actors that will motivate them to defect. At the same time, if deals had been made with various Deep State actors, those who bargained to keep the reality of Epstein’s “suicide” a secret, then Patel’s statements would appear like the Trump administration is holding up their part of the bargain, which would offer a sense of confidence, that make it easier for other Deep State actors to defect.
The idea that Trump is negotiating with criminal elements is understandably unpalatable to the many Americans who feel betrayed and who’ve been hurt and harmed as a result of their activity. But in war, compromise to end hostilities is critical.
The benefit to this strategy is that it makes it much easier for the Deep State to surrender, so that the more important work of rebuilding and restoring our nation, and the subjugated nations of the world, can finally begin in earnest.
If true, this strategy targets middle-tier operatives—those poised to jump ship as the corruption-fueled machinery of the Deep State, with its sprawling tentacles, grinds to a halt. More broadly, it would also target higher-level actors, but by and large, the more support and power those at the top possess, and if they are more ideologically driven (reflective of personal investment in the Deep State cause, as it were), the less likely they are to defect. Martyrs are not usually made from those who are only turning a blind eye to corruption for a paycheck. The less ideologically invested someone is in the cause, the more easily they are to be persuaded by pressures to jump to a winning team, when their team is losing power.
Consider the breadth of Trump’s actions over the years—both widely recognized and shrouded in secrecy—and a compelling case emerges: Trump, alongside a covert cadre within his administration, is tirelessly orchestrating sweeping reforms to restore freedom and prosperity for Americans, amongst other unrevealed objectives. This is the hidden aspect of Agenda 47, which is vital because, as we’ll explore, the crises plaguing our nation and the world operate on dual planes: overt (public) and covert (clandestine). Criminal syndicates burrowed deep within the fabric of civilization, scheming behind closed doors. Yet Trump, with measured and effective effort, is gaining ground in both realms, steadily uprooting these malignant forces wherever they lurk.
Trump’s Deep State Destabilization Operation
Fueled by prosecutorial leverage and strategic inducement, the looming specter of Epstein’s files is wielded to pressure mid-tier operatives within a deeply entrenched, corrupt power structure—those whose allegiance dangles on the threads of blackmail and bribes—into defection or compliance with a broader mission to dismantle the mafia-like grip strangling America’s democratic institutions. At the same time, other actors within the Deep State-controlled government are almost totally unaware of any corruption, and their ignorance acts as an effective patsy shield. If this holds, it signals that progress is quietly unfolding, even if the surface suggests otherwise.
This A47 Brief explores the theory that a covert arm of President Trump’s administration is operating behind the scenes to dismantle the Deep State. Trump won’t brazenly go after the Deep State due to the fact the Deep State, and the architects and beneficiaries thereof, are only beginning to be acknowledged in the public eye as a nest of entrenched corruption in the U.S. Trump, as the overt public face of this covert operation, generates media attention, increases awareness in the general public, distracts opponents, and negotiates all at the same time, while a covert team—in which Trump likely plays a major role—pressures Deep State actors across various layers to defect.
The Deep State’s compartmentalized structure makes it vulnerable to such strategies. Middle-tier Deep State actors, who are often unaware of the fact that they are pawns of much bigger criminal enterprises, are coerced through blackmail and bribes as a standard practice. To these unaware pawns, there is no Deep State, there is only the government, seemingly lawful and upstanding, which they have been conditioned to blindly believe in via the media and whatever corporate cultural reinforcement mechanism operating in their compartmentalized area of activity. That is to say, to the normal government employee, there is only the government and the normal media (CNN, NBC, CBS, etc) that say the same message on all the channels, proving that’s what’s “normal,” whereas anyone who says anything different is the fringe. For instance, the Biden administration was staffed with woke progressives who pushed the Deep State agenda, all while being unaware of the fact that they were being used as pawns.
As the figure heads of the Deep State, recognizable, in part, as the progressive leaders of the left, experience greater exposure, this will destabilize the confidence of the middle-tier Deep State assets ensnared by this narrative. They will begin to flee like rats on a sinking ship, jumping to the safe harbor of the Trump administration, where they will reveal their secrets and assist Trump in dismantling the Deep State.
The Epstein saga, far from being a mere unresolved scandal, serves as a dagger dangling over the heads of complicit actors in media, industry, and government. The covert Trump administration, sometimes referred to as white hats, operating behind the public’s view, appears to be using the threat of disclosures to destabilize the old guard, compelling them to align with a vision of governance rooted in the principles of freedom, justice, and prosperity. This may be influencing the power players behind the scenes since his arrest in July 2019.
Our lives have been invaded by EMF radiation through your cell phone, WiFi, the electrical grid, 5G, and the coming biomedical technology revolution is just around the corner. Protect your health and the health of your family with the very best in EMF protection.
Buy here and watch my interview with FTW Project Morocco, a good friend and partner with Just In Stillness.
While the public rightfully wants the Epstein disclosures to come out, the slow drip of information and lack of arrests may reflect a calculated strategy to maximize leverage, forcing defections and exposing the illusion of an honest, good-faith democracy. To do this, Pam Bondi and others need to tease that major revelations are coming forward, and then wait to see how suspected corrupt actors respond. By wielding the Epstein files as a tool of leverage, Trump’s team is not merely seeking justice for one case but orchestrating a seismic shift toward a system that reflects the true spirit of American ideals.
I am referring to this strategy as prosecutorial leverage and strategic inducement.
In the context of the Trump administration’s covert strategy to uproot systemic corruption and dismantle the Deep State, prosecutorial leverage refers to the lawful use of the president’s authority to wield compromising information—such as the unreleased Jeffrey Epstein files—as a tool to pressure mid-tier actors in the entrenched, corrupt power structure, compelling them to defect or cooperate by exposing their vulnerabilities to public or legal scrutiny.
Similarly, strategic inducement describes the deliberate tactic of offering these actors incentives, such as protection from reputational ruin, to abandon their loyalty to the corrupt establishment and align with a reformist agenda rooted in freedom, justice, and prosperity. Together, these methods exploit the fear of exposure among bureaucrats, media figures, and industry insiders—whose public image as upstanding officials masks their complicity—driving defections to dismantle the mafia-like order that has subverted America’s democratic institutions.
It should be noted that it is highly likely, the Deep State and the beneficiaries and architects thereof, being a corrupt organization, were already intending to discard middle-tier actors in the organization. Like any pawn that realizes they are a pawn, when someone offers them a path out, they often feel highly motivated to accept the offer.
The Walls Are Closing In on Margaret Hensley, Mid-Tier Deep State Pawn
Margaret Hensley sat in her Alexandria condo, the TV’s glow casting shadows across her orderly living room. A mid-tier USAID official, she’d spent years navigating bureaucracy, signing off on questionable grants to secure her GS-14 status. Tonight, Fox News blared: “DOGE EXPOSES USAID FRAUD: MILLIONS DIVERTED TO ELITE DONORS.” Maria Bartiromo’s voice cut through: “The Department of Government Efficiency has uncovered corruption at USAID. Names will be released soon.” A familiar document flashed on-screen—one Margaret had approved, trusting it was “just paperwork.”
Her wine glass trembled in her hand. They’re closing in. The Epstein files, still unreleased, loomed over Washington. Margaret wasn’t on any flight logs, but she’d signed enough vague contracts to know she wasn’t clean.
The system had demanded her silence, and she’d complied for promotions. Now, DOGE’s audits and public outrage on X signaled her time was up.
She muted the TV, the silence amplifying her dread. Her reputation—Georgetown dinners, a senator’s photo—felt fragile. The deep state was sinking, and her bosses wouldn’t save her. “I’m not going down with them.”
She opened her laptop, recalling a Trump administration contact who’d hinted at “opportunities” for those who’d “do the right thing.” Her fingers typed: “I have information. I want to help.” Hitting send, Margaret felt a flicker of hope. The walls were closing in, but she’d step out before they crushed her.
Margaret Hensley isn’t a real person, but the story is prototypical of what many middle-tier Deep State actors are no doubt feeling right now.
James O’Keefe’s Disillusionment with the Second Trump Administration
On a recent episode of Timcast IRL, James O’Keefe, the founder of Project Veritas, now working through his new organization O’Keefe Media Group (OMG), talked about the personal and professional betrayals that led to his ousting from the organization he built in 2023, tying it to a broader narrative of disillusionment with the justice system and the second Trump administration. O’Keefe’s appearance centered on the FBI raid of his newsroom, the fallout from his explosive Pfizer whistleblower story, and the systemic failures he believes persist under Trump’s Department of Justice (DoJ).
O’Keefe recounted how his 2023 ousting from Project Veritas stemmed from internal sabotage by board members with vested interests in the medical industry, who signed a conflict of interest policy. He alleged that the board member, eyeing lucrative buyouts from pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, viewed his Pfizer exposé as a direct threat to their financial prospects.
O’Keefe said the board member he confronted invested in medical firms hoping that Pfizer would by them out, receiving a payday in the process, and as such, O’Keefe’s exposé was a threat to the business deal. The exposé, which revealed internal Pfizer discussions about gain-of-function research, sparked a firestorm that O’Keefe believes catalyzed his removal from Project Veritas in 2023.
The situation is quintessential of the core problem in the nation and the world in general, that for many people in positions of power, doing the right thing comes second to maintaining one’s station in life. That is, otherwise, good people will do the right thing, so long as it doesn’t threaten their social status, financial future, or quality of life. But, O’Keefe, being the principled man that he is, does not subscribe to this convenience patriotism. Instead, like Trump and many others in the MAGA movement, just as the Founding Fathers demonstrated in their lives, doing the right thing is the highest priority, even if it means risking life, liberty, property, and sacred honor.
Unsettling Redactions of the SDNY Under Trump’s Administration
The fallout didn’t end there. O’Keefe detailed the FBI’s 2023 raid on his newsroom, which he linked to the same Pfizer story.
In February 2025, under the new Trump DoJ, a Southern District of New York (SDNY) judge later released the legal brief justifying the raid, but it was heavily redacted—virtually unreadable.
O’Keefe told Pool he spent millions on legal fees over the years, and this redacted document from the SDNY did not instill confidence that things were improving under Trump. This happened under Trump’s DoJ, not Biden’s. When O’Keefe raised concerns about the injustice of the situation, referring to conversations he had privately with officials who have some say in the matter, he said on the show, he was told he needed to effectively call in a favor by calling Kash Patel or Pam Bondi. A true system of justice shouldn’t demand millions in legal fees or backroom favor-calling to deliver justice or due process, O’Keefe suggested.
This exchange underscored O’Keefe’s broader disillusionment with the justice system in general, which he described as “kleptocratic.” He argued that the system’s reliance on personal connections rather than institutional integrity highlighted its failure.
The conversation resonated with the broader MAGA movement’s growing frustration with the second Trump administration, in light of the fact that no major arrests or reforms have manifested as of yet.
Many Trump supporters, who pinned their hopes on swift justice and systemic reform, feel let down by the slow pace of change. But that hasn’t happened. And what seems like a betrayal is that figures like Dan Bogino and Kash Patel, who have been some of the more outspoken and enthusiastic supporters of reform, seem to have reversed course on obvious issues like Epstein’s death.
But while these concerns are justified, the greater mission might not be lost.
The Long Game of Trump’s Mission
The sense of frustration and discontent is real, but it isn’t clear that nothing is happening or all is lost. If we consider the history of large-scale criminal takedown operations, they often take months, if not years or even decades, to show progress.
A Leviathan of Corruption
Trump may have begun his campaign to "drain the swamp" in 2015, leading to the impression that once he took office, he would swiftly deliver justice, arrest the perpetrators, and reform the system. However, this expectation seems overly optimistic given the reality of what Trump is up against.
As many know, Trump is confronting one of the most corrupt, deeply entrenched, and well-funded criminal syndicates in recorded history. The global network of crime and its influence is monolithic in scope, ruthless in execution, and seemingly all-encompassing in the sheer number of institutions under its control. Moreover, most citizens are unaware of the true extent of this situation, while many others are complicit. As such, he has to advance the fullness of the operation in secret while managing the public to rally support, all without letting on what he’s really doing, or it might put the mission at risk.
Countless citizens are compromised, government officials and partners in the private sector earn lavish salaries, amass millions or even billions, and gain fame and status by serving their hidden masters. And in my respect, these same loyal servants of the Deep State are unaware of the fact that they are pawns. In fact, they are encased in an echo chamber of self-reinforcing narratives that lead them to believe they are on the right side of history, when nothing could be further from the truth. Case in point, the many progressive agendas that defraud the people and cost taxpayers billions.
The incentive to stay silent, ignore the corruption, and go along to get along is immense. Those who are aware and have the courage to act have fought for years, if not decades, without support. This suggests that Trump’s task is, and has been, monumental, and the team working with him to advance the reform and justice agenda against the Deep State faces numerous uphill battles.
Trump’s Mission Heretofore
Trump’s mission over the past nine years has been threefold: a) for Trump to broadcast the MAGA mission to garner public support; b) to assemble a team loyal to the MAGA mission to fill key government roles when the time is right; and c) to take office so the next phase of the mission can begin.
This next phase, which was entered when he took office, involves reforming the various government institutions and apparatuses necessary to execute the "drain the swamp" mission and the broader MAGA agenda. That means he is only beginning this next phase, which is arguably just as complex and involved as the previous phase, if not more so. It requires exposing corruption, drawing a line in the sand to make it obvious to the rank-and-file Deep State employees the scale of the corruption they were working for, and recruiting from these ranks men and women who recognize the shifting tide, who want to join the right side of history. This process takes time, as Trump must appoint individuals like Kash Patel and Dan Bongino to agencies such as the FBI, or Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to HHS, who then face their own monumental battles to bring these corrupt institutions to heel. While all this is happening, he must manage a weaponized media, the onslaught of critiques from half, if not totally, uninformed commentators, pundits, and members of Congress and government, and maintain morale with the voting public.
Reforming a Compromised Government via Internal and External Pressure
It seems we are in the reform of government phase of the operation, which means we won’t see major victories for some time. Moreover, due to the tactics necessary to mount the campaign, corrupt actors need to be made to feel safe enough to continue being bold with their corruption so as to expose themselves (hence the downplaying of US AG Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel) while at the same time, various campaigns to put pressure on those who can be turned unfolds. In this last regard, Pam Bondi’s statements about Epstein’s vast trove of CSAM material act as a catalyst to draw out those who can be turned while leading those who can’t to double down and dig an even deeper hole for themselves. It’s an internal and external pressure strategy, one that is proven to work well.
AG Pam Bondi Brunch Video, Mistake or Intentional?
To wage this campaign, corrupt players must feel emboldened to flaunt their brazen corruption—hence the calculated downplaying by FBI Director Kash Patel. Simultaneously, subtle campaigns unfold to pressure those ripe for defection, like the seemingly unintended disclosures to the press about the severity of the Epstein files by US Attorney General Pam Bondi
In this area, Bondi’s pointed remarks about Epstein’s vast trove of CSAM material serve as a spark, coaxing turncoats to break ranks while luring the unyielding to double down, digging themselves an even deeper grave.
How?
As James O’Keefe and others have speculated, Pam Bondi’s public remarks seem like a reaction to the explosive video released by OMG. Was she forced to say something because she was caught unawares? Based on what’s come out so far, it seems like that could be the case. That said, the strategy explored in this article, suggesting that Trump and his allies, like Bondi, are engaged in a sting operation, remains unaffected. That is, whether it was a mistake or intentional, the overall effect would exert the pressures needed.
The strategy hinges on applying both internal and external pressure, in which case, Bondi’s statements bolster the theory that the Trump administration is deliberately downplaying past corruption in public, lulling complicit Deep State operatives—those entangled in Epstein’s alleged web—into a false sense of security. This sets a trap, catching these actors in their misdeeds, while institutions that have been hidden from the truth, and are now led by Bondi, Patel, and others, can bear witness firsthand to whatever bold acts of corruption are committed by the Deep State in response.
Bondi’s public statements after O’Keefe’s video might not undermine this operation, they could enhance it, because it suggests that the DoJ is intentionally being secretive because there’s an investigation happening, while at the same time, OMG, acts as an unaffiliated media force vector to exert pressure from the outside. This matches the Teapot Dome case from the 1920s, as will be discussed in the next section. Such exposure could sway middle-tier managers and rank-and-file Deep Staters, previously blind to the corruption’s scope, to confront its ugly truth within their domains. Put simply, when an FBI agent or DOJ employee encounters Epstein-like depravity within government ranks, and without the media to spin the narrative to maintain their loyality, the shocking revelation could turn them, sparking a cascade of defections among these mid-level players, each sharing the truth and fueling a tidal wave of betrayal against the crumbling Deep State.
At least, that’s one lens through which to view this shadowed chessboard. It should be noted, I am giving voice to one interpretation of these events, which might not be accurate but is nonetheless valid to consider.
What we are likely witnessing now is this reform mission unfolding. As the following example illustrates, it involves applying internal pressure within these institutions to expose bad-faith actors loyal to the old-world-order regime while simultaneously exerting external pressure through the media.
Teapot Dome’s Media-Driven Collapse: A Historical Blueprint for Trump’s Deep State Takedown
There are several historical examples of the media being used to pressure a criminal organization so that the middle-tier players defect and start working with law enforcement.
The Teapot Dome scandal (1921–1924) exposed a corrupt faction within President Harding’s administration, where high-level actor Secretary of the Interior Albert B. Fall and middle-tier bureaucrats colluded with oil companies to lease federal reserves for bribes.
Investigative journalists, through outlets like The Wall Street Journal, ignited public outrage by uncovering the secret deals, prompting a Senate investigation. Media pressure fractured the faction, leading middle-tier actors—like oil intermediaries and bureaucrats—to defect, testifying against Fall to avoid ruin.
Fall was convicted of bribery in 1929, and the scandal spurred anti-corruption reforms.
This appears to mirror the Trump administration’s current strategy, assuming that the thesis is correct, where media influence, DOGE’s exposure of bloated projects, and threats of Epstein file disclosures (along with other factors) pressure the Deep State’s middle-tier managers—partially informed actors complicit through kickbacks or blackmail—to defect.
Much like Teapot Dome’s defectors, these managers of the Deep State, fearing jail or reputational destruction, may turn to Trump’s side, believing he holds enough evidence to ruin them. The sting operation model from Teapot Dome, where exposure led to defections, parallels Trump’s possible dual approach: dismantling the deep state’s financial machine (via DOGE, border closures, and tariffs) while leveraging the Epstein files to compel compliance (i.e., prosecutorial leverage and strategic inducement).
Simultaneously, Trump’s tariffs may foster new economic sectors free of Deep State corruption, reducing inflation and rebuilding the economy for citizens unaware of the corruption’s depth, echoing Teapot Dome’s broader push for a less corrupt system.
James O’Keefe Bombshell
In May 2025, James O’Keefe, dropped a bombshell: exclusive footage from Jeffrey Epstein’s Little Saint James island, revealing a chilling photo of a naked baby in a stained sink in Epstein’s kitchen. This was just one of several releases of never-before-seen footage that emerged right alongside some other developments related to the Epstein case.
Here is footage of the temple on Epstein’s Island.
The scene inside Epstein's temple is interesting. The columns, one spiraled, one straight, suggest the masculine and feminine, which is a well-recognized principle in various secret orders and mystery schools, both modern and from antiquity.
Here is footage of Epstein’s bedroom on the island.
Here’s footage of Epstein’s library.
O’Keefe notes that despite this shocking evidence of depravity on the part of Epstein and high-level political and wealthy players implicated, not a single Epstein client has been arrested as of May 2025.
Many suspect the worst, that this isn’t just a failure of justice; it’s a glaring symptom of a deeper, more insidious problem: the architects of the Deep State, a shadowy network of insiders that has long shielded corrupt actors across government, business, and media are stopping even the massively popular Trump administration from fulfilling the Agenda 47 mission.
While this is possible, and seems to be the case in some respects, there is one theory that explains this apparent lack of concrete action.
“I felt like I was getting a cold, but Agarikon stopped it in its tracks.”
Organic AGARIKON fights Viruses & Bio-warfare, and much more!
10 times more effective than ribavirin against Herpes (HSV1, HSV2), Swine flu (H1N1), Bird flu (H1N4), Pox (cowpox). Studied by the DoD for the Bioshield program.
Get your Agarikon biodefense from Ascent Nutrition, one of the most pure and potent in the industry.
Save 10% and get free shipping with a subscription!
Epstein Did Kill Himself, Patel and Bongino
Update: Wednesday, May 28th, FBI Director Kash Patel recently appeared on Fox News and was asked about the Epstein files. His answers support the arguments in this article.
On Sunday, May 19th, Kash Patel and Dan Bongino disappointed many when they said that the infamous billionaire pedophile did kill himself in August of 2019.
This stance by Bongino seems contradictory in light of his past statements.
This was hard to hear for many who believed, for good reason. Many believed Patel and Bongino would be more honest with the American people about the suspicious circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death.
There are many reasons to suspect that Epstein did not, in fact, kill himself.
Failure of Prison Protocols: At the Metropolitan Correctional Center, guards failed to check on Epstein.
Suspicious Camera Failure: Cameras malfunctioned just as Epstein was committing the alleged act of suicide, raising doubts about the oversight of his detention.
Suspicious Timing and Predictions: Spencer Kuvin, a lawyer for Epstein’s victims, warned in July 2019 that Epstein might be targeted in prison, a concern heightened by Epstein’s first apparent suicide attempt shortly before his death on August 10, 2019.
Public Distrust in Official Narrative: A Rasmussen Reports poll showed only 29% of U.S. adults believed the official suicide-by-hanging ruling, while 42% thought Epstein was murdered to silence him, reflecting widespread skepticism.
Epstein’s Knowledge of Powerful Figures: Epstein’s connections to influential individuals and his possession of compromising information fueled conspiracy theories that his death was orchestrated to protect those figures.
Lack of Transparency and Systemic Corruption: The lack of clear answers, combined with public distrust in institutions—as highlighted in the blog post’s critique of the Globalist Elite Cabal (Section 1)—supports the belief that Epstein’s death was a cover-up to safeguard elite secrets.
Possibility 1: Bongino and Patel have been compromised
Someone might have threatened or bribed Pate, Bongino, and others to the extent that they’re not able to reveal the truth hidden in the FBI files. Furthermore, if this were true, it would also suggest that other Trump administration appointees have also been compromised.
While this is possible, this seems unlikely. Why? Because their language was carefully chosen. They referred to the information in the files, and it confirmed that it was a suicide. The implication here is that, like many have supposed, the files are likely incomplete or compromised.
Possibility 2: Patel and Bongino are engaged in a bargaining operation
The theory that I have explored in this series is that Agenda 47 appears to be uprooting corruption and built-in mechanisms of tyranny and manipulation.
The Deep State, with its architects and beneficiaries, has weaponized the very fabric of civilization to manipulate those at the bottom—rank-and-file citizens—and the narrative siloed middle managers caught between them and the elite puppeteers. This grim reality points to a stark conclusion: radical change cannot rely solely on broken government systems, deliberately fractured by design, nor are they the true glue binding the nation’s bureaucracy to the principles of justice and freedom, as we have been led to believe.
The laws and rules of our corrupted society serve as a cover, deception concealing the real superstructure: overlapping webs of corrupt factions and syndicates. An unflinching look reveals that corruption—its means and machinations—forms the true scaffolding of our government. While Trump vowed to drain this swamp, he cannot succeed without a robust enforcement arm or a reformed governmental machine. Much like his past triumph in dismantling New York’s mob, a dual strategy of reform and covert pressure is essential, leveraging prosecutorial leverage and strategic inducement.
At its core, power dynamics and strategic bargaining drive the real work. Thus, it’s plausible that Kash Patel and Dan Bongino are playing calculated roles in a shadowed operation, wielding the Epstein saga as a covert weapon to unravel the Deep State’s grip.
The Epstein Card
The theory posits that Jeffrey Epstein operated as an intelligence asset, entwined with corrupt global governments, amassing a treasure trove of evidence implicating influential figures in government, business, and media for lawbreaking and taboo-shattering acts. The Deep State’s architects wield blackmail to bend elected officials and mid-tier managers to their will, threatening exposure if they stray from the script.
What’s painfully clear is the absence of genuine democracies worldwide. As countless regime changes and soft power campaigns reveal, governments are propped up by mafioso-like tactics—bribes, kickbacks, and blackmail, to name a few. Blackmail thrives on social dynamics, exploiting in-group and out-group hierarchies. Violating a taboo can plummet someone to the lowest social strata, ravaging their reputation, finances, and businesses. In the victim of blackmail, this triggers primal psychological stress, weaponizing the threat of abandonment to coerce actions otherwise unthinkable. Taboos, whether naturally formed or seeded through media-driven cultural manipulation, amplify this power. For instance, the n-word’s taboo status, shaped by decades of media influence, contrasts with its acceptance 70 years ago. Some taboos, like those against rape or pedophilia, are rational; others, like questioning vaccine dogma, are artificially crafted through strategic propaganda. Thus, blackmail turns the general populace into an unwitting weapon against its targets because, through the deep need to fit in, the threat of ostracization can compel most people to do almost anything to avoid being ousted from the in-group.
Contrast this with prosecutorial leverage and strategic inducement. While blackmail seeks compliance and resource extraction by hiding taboo violations, once loyalties are secured via coercion, prosecutorial leverage threatens social ostracism through trials and potential imprisonment, aiming to halt criminal behavior and spur defection with valuable intelligence. The goal is not wealth but reform, stopping further crimes and exposing the truth.
Since Epstein’s death, whispers of powerful players implicated in his network have swirled, suggesting they could be pressured into aligning with the Trump administration. To achieve this, the administration may be fanning suspicions of possessing Epstein’s damning evidence while publicly downplaying the saga to placate defectors. When Kash Patel and Dan Bongino minimized Epstein’s story on Fox News, it may have masked a deeper play: a covert Trump administration amassing defectors, poised to unleash a reckoning on those who refuse to comply when the moment is at hand.
Power First, Peace Later
While the desire for a law and order civilization is noble, that isn’t the reality of the world today. The Founding Fathers took power, by force, from the British and undermined their own citizens who were loyal to the King. Once they had power, once they took the field, then they attempted to impose the ideals of truth, justice, and the American way. In a corrupt game, the rules of war are the only hope for righteous men to carve out a better world. Conversely, attempting to play a fair game when playing against cheaters, liars, and bad-faith actors only guarantees loss.
Trump’s penchant for bargaining, a hallmark of his approach, suggests such a strategy is plausible, if unproven in the public eye. Disappointment is natural, but the reality is stark: no true justice system, rooted in principle and good faith, exists. The illusion of unwavering laws and moral governance has crumbled over the past nine years, revealing backroom deals, conspiracies, bribes, and blackmail as the historical norm, likely stretching to the Republic’s earliest days.
Yet the dream of justice endures. A truly just, rule-of-law civilization is attainable, but it demands a culture where most citizens—especially those in power—play honestly. That culture doesn’t exist yet. Still, Trump’s actions, promises, and the MAGA movement’s aspirations hint at striving for this ideal. For now, victory requires playing the corrupt game of the Deep State and global elites, who’ve brought us to this precipice. It’s a war, and like all wars, only after defeating the enemy can the victors reshape civilization’s rules—hopefully toward truth, justice, and prosperity.
With love,
Justin
Please tell me what you think or let me know if I got something wrong. I want to hear from you.
Justin Deschamps is a researcher, omniologist, podcaster, and business consultant who has committed himself to restoring the knowledge, reason, and goodwill that helped the founding fathers create the greatest nation on earth.
Follow me on:
Less is more and giving the perception of “nothing to see here” takes the heat off the guilty. When the time is right, “it’s game over! “ this is what we are are hoping and praying for.
We can hope for justice and truth, which can be attain in society; but only if the majority and the leaders, show and act in honesty and integrity.